The Importance of Genital Mutilations to Gender Power Politics
PDF

Keywords

Genital mutilation
Circumcision
Gender power politics

How to Cite

El-Salam, S. A. (1). The Importance of Genital Mutilations to Gender Power Politics. Al-Raida Journal, 33-43. https://doi.org/10.32380/alrj.v0i0.458

Abstract

Male and female genital mutilations (known as circumcision) are known in some cultures as rites of passage and purificatoin (Kennedy 1970; Toubia 1993; Turner 1985). However, I argue that they have another less declared but very significant aspect: they are functions and tools of patriarchal gender power politics. This paper deals with both types of genital mutilations, male and female, though it gives more attention to Male Genital Mutilation (MGM) because it is a muted gender issue. It is based on a study that I carried out in 1999-2000. It is a qualitative field study on the attitudes of 23 Egyptian intellectuals towards MGM*. All of the respondents are active against female genital mutilatoin (FGM) but tolerant to MGM. I interviewd them on semi-structured one-one basis. One important result of this study is that MGM as practiced in Egypt today is based on gender power politics (Abd el Salam 2000). Following is an elaboratoin on this point through interpretatoin of some observed beliefs and practices related to MGM and FGM.

https://doi.org/10.32380/alrj.v0i0.458
PDF

References

Abd el Salam, Seham. 1998. Female Sexuality and the Discourse of Power: The Case of Egypt. Cairo: AUC/ MAThesis.

Abd el Salam, Seham. 2000. Male Genital mutilation (MGM): A Feminist Study of a Muted Gender issue. Cairo: non published research with the support a fellowship post-masters grant from Sociology Anthropology Department, AUC.

Aldeeb Abu-Sahlieh, Sami. 2000. Male and Female Circumcision Among Jews, Christians and Muslims: Religious Debate (khitaan al-zukuur wal-inaath ‘and yahud, wal-masihiyyin wal-muslimin: al gadal al diny), Riyad El-Rayyes, Beirut, 2000.

Assaad, Mary B. 1980. “Female Circumcision in Egypt: Social Implications, Current Research, and Prospects for Change”. Studies in Family Planning. 1980 Jan. 11(1): 3-16.

Bettelheim, Bruno. 1954. Symbolic Wounds: Puberty Rites and the Envious Male. Illinois: The Free Press.

Chamberlain, David B. 1991. “Babies Don’t Feel Pain: A Century of Denial in Medicine”. A Paper presented to the Second International Symposium on Circumcision. April 30-May 3 1991. San Francisco. California.

Cold, C.J; and J.R. Taylor. 1999. “The Prepuce”. The British Journal of Urology. Vol. 83. supplement 1. January 1999 Pp:34-44.

DeMeo, J. 1997. The Geography of Male and Female Genital Mutilations. In Denniston, George C. and Marilyn Fayre Milos (eds.) 1997. Sexual Mutilations: A Human Tragedy. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation. Reproduced at website: http://www.noharmm.org/geography.htm

Dorkenoo, Efua. 1994. Cutting the Rose. London: Minority Rights Publications.

Durkheim, Emil. 1893. The Division of Labor in Society. Published in 1984 by the Free Press. New York.

Foucault, Michel. 1984. The History of Sexuality (Vol. 1). London: Penguin Books.

Goldman, Ronald. 1997. Circumcision The Hidden Trauma: How an American Cultural Practice Affects Infants and Ultimately Us All. Boston: Vanguard Publications.

Gunnar, M. et. Al., 1985. “Coping with Adversive Stimulation in the Neonatal Period: Quite Sleep and Plasma Cortisol Levels During Recovery from Circumcision”. Child Development. 56 (1985): 824-834. Reproduced at website:http://www.cirp.org/library/pain/gunnar1985/

Gunnar, M. et. Al., 1988. “Adrenocortical Activity and Behavioral Distress in Human Newborns”. Developmental Psychobiology. 21(1988). 297-310. Reproduced at website: http://www.cirp.org/library/pain/gunnar1988/

Hastings, James; et.al. 1980. “Circumcision”. In Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics. Vol. 3. Edinburgh: Clark.

Hatem, Mervat. 1986. “The Enduring Alliance of Nationalism and Patriarchy”. Feminist Issues. Spring 1986, 6(1): 20-43.

Immerman, Ronald S. and Wade C. Mackaey. 1998. “A Biocultural Analysis of Circumcision” . Social Biology. Vol. 44, No. 3-4, pp:267-273

Janeway, Elizabeth. 1980. Powers of the Weak. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Kennedy, John G. 1970. “Circumcision and Excision in Egyptian Nubia”, Man, Vol. 5, No. 2, June 1970, pp. 175-191.

Lennon, Kathleen, and Margaret Whitford (eds.) 1994. Knowing the Difference: Feminist Perspectives in Epistemology. London: Routledge.

Lerner, Gerda. 1986. The Creation of Patriarchy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lightfoot-Klein, Hanny. 1994. “Erroneous Belief Systems Underlying Female Genital Mutilation in sub-Saharan Africa and Male Neonatal Circumcision in the United States: a Brief Report Updated”. Paper presented to the Third International Symposium on Circumcision. May 22-35 1994. University of Maryland College Park, Maryland.

Lightfoot-Klein, Hanny. 1997. “Similarities in Attitudes and Misconceptions about Male and Female Sexual Mutilations”. In Denniston, George C. and Marilyn Fayre Milos (eds.) 1997. Sexual Mutilations: AHuman Tragedy. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation.

Montagu, Ashley. 1991. “Mutilated Humanity”. A Paper presented to the Second International Symposium on Circumcision. April 30-May 3 1991. San Francisco. California.

Moore, Henrietta. 1988. Feminism and Anthropology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

NOHARMM. 1994. Awakening: A Preliminary Poll of Circumcised Men. San Francisco: the National Organization to Halt Abuse and Routine Mutilation of Males (NOHARMM).

O’Hara, K. and J O’Hara. 1999. “The effect of Male Circumcision on the Sexual Enjoyment of the Female Partner”. The British Journal of Urology. Vol. 83. supplement 1. January 1999. Pp:79-85.

Paige, Karen Erickson. 1978. “The Ritual of Circumcision”. Human Nature. May 1978. Pp:40-48. Reproduced at website: http://www.noharmm.org/paige.htm

Sacks, Karen Brodkin. 1989. “Towards a Unified Theory of Class, Race, and Gender”. American Ethnologist, 16(3) Aug. 1989: 534-550.

Scheper-Hughes, Nancy. 1987. “The Mindful Body: a Prolegomenon to Future Work in Medical Anthropology”. Medical Anthropology Quarterly. 1. N.s.: 6- 41.

Taylor, J.R., A.P. Lockwood and A.J. Taylor. 1996. “The Prepuce: Specialized Mucosa of the Penis and its Loss to Circumcision”. British Journal of Urology. 1996, 77: 291-295. Reproduced on website http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/tailor/

Toubia, Nahid. 1993. Female Genital Mutilation: A Call For Global Action. New York: Women Ink.

Trask, Haunani- Kay. 1986. Eros and Power: The Promise of Feminist Theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Turner, Victor. 1985. On The Edge of the Bush: Anthropology as Experience. Tuscan: The University of Arizona Press.

Wallerstein, Edward. 1980. Circumcision: An American Health Fallacy. New York: Springer Publishing Company.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.